I was just reading a post on a friend’s blog, Sire with the WassupBlog called Where Do You Stand On Climate Change. My comment went so long I kept it for myself as a blog post. Sorry Sire.
I have a work buddy that has posted half a dozen YouTube videos on his Facebook showing the scams involved with Global Warming (you get’m George). He says, “Global warming is the biggest HOAX of all time“. I find it impossible to believe that tens of thousands of scientists with no political gain all conspired with each other to fool the world. To what end? Would you spend years stationed on an ice cap studying the effects of global warming if you believed it were just a big conspiracy?
It’s obvious there are big changes in regard to the weather. Perhaps it’s just natural changes that the Earth goes through and man has nothing to do with it. Personally I feel we are effecting the planet but only time will tell. Either way, things are getting interesting. The debate is fascinating even for those of us that are not all that political.
With that said, I just dumped $70 into my F-150 and love the V8 power plunging through the snow. I gas on it every chance I get. It’s easy for us to complain but few of us are prepared to suffer necessary changes if that were even possible. I want a F-250 for my next truck… That’s Right, I Said It!
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
What’s the difference between today’s global-warming models and medieval astrology? Answer: We know which astrological models were correct. That’s the conclusion of scientist Kanya Kusano in a January report published by the Japan Society of Energy and Resources, an Osaka-based professional scientific association. The paper, recently translated into English by British technology news Web site the Register, argues that medieval astrologers confirmed their theories by testing their predictions against celestial events that actually unfolded. Similarly, today’s climate science is so complex that only time — and a lot more observation — will tell whether what scientists think they know is really correct. Until then, the alarmist findings by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are “an unprovable hypothesis,” Mr. Kusano argues. Two of his colleagues on the five-member panel agree.Very good, you almost had me. Until, that is, a simple search showed you copied word for word from Climate Change Astrology proving you are nothing more than a low life spammer. Your new URL reflects as much. Ha Ha That’s Right, I Said It!